Vinayak Krishna More v. Smita Vinayak More
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dond
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 290 OF 2012 IN.
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2003
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Ravindra V. Sankpal for Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
P.C.:
Time of 4 weeks is granted to the Applicant to take steps for effecting service upon the Respondents.
If no steps are taken within the stipulated time, the Application shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without reference to the Court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dond
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri. Kailas Balasaheb Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept and Ors.
Swastik Industrial Corporation through Its Partner Nilesh Pradeep Chatranband Vs the State of Maharashtra Throgh Its Secretary, Social Welfare Dept. and Ors.
Mr. Sainath Hender Raut, through Poa, Mr. Ramesh Maruti Bhekre Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Dept of Urban Development and Anr.
Shaikh Shakeel Sultan and Ors. Vs Nandgaon Municipal Council, through Chief Officer and Ors.