This court considered an application for condonation of delay in filing a Family Court Appeal under Section 94-s of the Bombay Rent Control Act, 1999. The court held that sufficient cause existed for the delay and allowed the application.
Condonation of delay in filing the Family Court Appeal allowed; appeal placed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca278-14
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2014
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.20235 OF 2014
Mrs. Anita Ravi Papadkar ..Applicant.
V/s.
Ravi Dattu Papadkar
..Respondent.
Mr. Manish D. Alwe i/b. Bhavana Y. Tandel for the applicant. Mr.A.U.Shaikh for the respondent.
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 30TH OCTOBER, 2014
P.C. :-
November, 2014.
(A.K. MENON, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1/1
Mrs. Anita Ravi Papadkar
Ravi Dattu Papadkar
V.K. Tahilramani
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
