The High Court Bench condoned the delay in the State applying for review of stay orders and disposed of four limited civil applications without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/2 471.14-caf--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 471 OF 2014 IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 18 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant.
V/s.
Shri Budhya Mangalaya Patil (since deceased through his legal heirs Shri Raghunath Budhaji Patil & anr.
... Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2014 IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 22 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s. Shri Krishna Balu Tandel and others. ... Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 477 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 26 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s.
Shri Shantu Govind Patil (since deceased through his legal heirs Smt. Indumati Maniklal Patil and others. ... Respondents.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 480 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 30 OF 2014
skn 2/2 471.14-caf-The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s. Smt.Dhakalubai Prabhakar Patil and others. ... Respondents.
A.R.Patil, AGP for the applicant- State.
Sagar Mane for the respondents.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED : 13th October 2014.
P.C. :
Heard.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay and disposal of multiple civil applications deserves recording.
Whether the state's civil applications were to be allowed or dismissed.
The State of Maharashtra
Shri Budhya Mangalaya Patil
Shri Krishna Balu Tandel
Shri Shantu Govind Patil
Smt. Dhakalubai Prabhakar Patil
NARESH H. PATIL
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
