Court condoned delay in filing company appeal based on affidavit and directed office to number and place matter for admission.
Delay in filing appeal condoned; matter listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
964-CA-16-2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO. 53 OF 2013
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 52 OF 2010
Ravindra Angara … Applicant/Appellant Versus M/s. Vikram Equipments India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Kaushal A. Tamhane for Applicant
Mr. Chauhan i/b. N.N. Vaishnawa & Co. for Respondents
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 19ST JUNE, 2014
P.C.:
Heard the Learned Advocate appearing for the Parties. For
the reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the above Company Application, the delay in filing the Appeal is condoned.
Office to forthwith number the Appeal and place the same
for 'Admission' before this Court on 23rd June, 2014.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
Ravindra Angara
M/s. Vikram Equipments India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
