In a company application regarding a civil petition, the single judge allowed the applicant's prayer based on the submitted affidavit without citing specific statutes or precedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
943-CA-502-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 502 OF 2013
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 778 OF 2009
SICOM Limited … Applicant Versus The OL, High Court, Bombay … Respondent Ms. Laxmi J. i/b. Jurisconsultus for Applicant
Mr. S. Ramakantha, OL, present.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 11TH JUNE, 2014
P.C.:
Perused the Company Application and the Affidavit in
support thereto. For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Company Application, the Company Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a).
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
SICOM Limited
The OL, High Court, Bombay
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
