In a company application, the Single Judge ordered administrative corrections to the minutes of an earlier order to update the authorised representative's name.
Directions issued to carry out corrections in the original and server copies of the order to reflect the name Mr. Pawan Laddha.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.ca.431.13.doc
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2013 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 535 OF 2013
Lafarge Agreements & Concrete
India Pvt. Ltd.....Applicants
Versus
Vishal Structurals Pvt. Limited.....Respondents
____________
Ms. Megan Ferandes i/b M. K. Ambalal & Co. for the Applicants.
CORAM: G. S. PATEL, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2014.
P.C.:
1. This is an application for speaking to the minutes of order dated 21st January 2014. In the minutes of 21st January 2014, the name of the authorised representative of the petitioner should be corrected to read as Mr. Pawan Laddha.
2. Corrections to be carried out in the original copy as also the copy uploaded on the server.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Lafarge Agreements & Concrete India Pvt. Ltd.
Vishal Structurals Pvt. Limited
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court