Mrs Beena John Vargis and Ors. v. State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Application dismissed as withdrawn by applicants' counsel. No substantive legal proposition stated as the matter was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA4016.2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4016 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7422 OF 2005
Beena w/o John Vargis, Aurangabad and others
...Applicants..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents.
-------------------Mr V. C. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr S. M. Godsay, Advocate for applicants Mr P. P. More, AGP for respondent/State
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15TH , 2014.
PER COURT :
Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that, he does
not want to press the instant application.
The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
sgp
Beena w/o John Vargis and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
A. V. Nirgude
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court