This order condones a 75-day delay in recalling an interim order, recalling the order dated 25.9.2013 and permitting simultaneous service on the respondent to allow for reissuing notice.
Condoned delay of 75 days; recalled order dated 25.9.2013; permitted simultaneous service by Speed Post/Regd. Post to reissue notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 324 OF 2014 IN FA/1688/2013 WITH CA/325/2014 IN FA/1688/2013
L AND T FINANCE COMPANY LTD. AURANGABAD VERSUS SHRIRANG NAMDEO KANADE AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Gangakhedkar Shailendra S
Mr.P C Mayure For R/1 Mr.S. G Chapalgaonkar For R/3
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. Dated: January 18, 2014
PER COURT :-
Simultaneous service by Speed Post / Regd.Post.Ack.Due upon respondent no.2 permitted.
Both the Civil Applications disposed of in above terms.
agp/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 75 days in making an application to recall an order can be condoned.
L AND T FINANCE COMPANY LTD. AURANGABAD
SHRIRANG NAMDEO KANADE
OTHERS
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
