Krantikari Kamgar Union v. the Officeial Liquidator of M/S. Zadona Electronics
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
MNOB-CAL-32-2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 32 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 518 OF 2005
Krantikari Kamgar Union … Applicant Versus
The OL of M/s. Zodana Electronics Limited … Respondent
Ms. Jane Cox for Applicant.
Ms. Sangeeta Yadav i/b. Suresh Kumar for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 9TH JUNE, 2014
P.C. :
Mentioned. Not on board.
By consent of the Parties, the Company Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Application is accordingly disposed of. Office to number the Company Application within a period of one week
from today.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
Krantikari Kamgar Union
The OL of M/s. Zodana Electronics Limited
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court