Single judge dismissed a Company Application filed in 2004 for want of prosecution due to over ten years of inactivity and failure by the applicant to provide instructions or remove office objections.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA(L) 609 of 2004 (914)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.609 OF 2004
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.360 OF 1998
SBI Capital Markets Ltd. …..Applicant versus The Official Liquidator of M/s. Trident Steels Ltd. …..Respondent
Mr. Gaurav Sinha i/by M/s. Little and Co., for Applicant. Mr. S. Ramakantha, Official Liquidator, present.
CORAM: S. J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 16TH JUNE, 2014
P. C.
1/2
ssp
CA(L) 609 of 2004 (914)
matter. In view thereof, I am constrained to dismiss the Company Application for want of prosecution.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Company Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution due to prolonged inactivity by the applicant?
Whether the continued failure to remove office objections and provide instructions warrants dismissal?
SBI Capital Markets Ltd.
The Official Liquidator of M/s. Trident Steels Ltd.
S. J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
