An application filed in the Bombay High Court regarding a company petition was disposed of as the respondents complied with previous orders, allowing the petition to be withdrawn. The court passed no order as to costs.
Civil application disposed of; petition allowed to be withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921-CAL-99.2014.DOC
Ars
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APLLICATION (L) NO. 99 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.442 OF 2012
Autograph Cars (I) Pvt. Ltd.…Applicants
Versus
Seema Arvind Vij & Ors.…Respondents
Ms.Kathalene Lobo, a/w Siddhesh Bhole, for the Applicants
Mr.S.B. Rao, i/b VKLEX & Associates, for the Respondents
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 6th May 2014
PC:-
Learned counsel for the applicants state that the respondents have complied with the terms of the order dated 6th March 2014. Therefore nothing remains in the matter. Civil Application is disposed of. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. No order as to costs.(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Autograph Cars (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Seema Arvind Vij
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court