This is a brief order allowing and disposing of Civil Application No. 1718 of 2014, where delay was condoned. No substantive grounds are detailed.
Application allowed, delay condoned, and matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1718.14ca
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1718 OF 2014 IN FCAST/2694/2014 WITH CA/1719/2014 IN FCAST/2694/2014
WALMIK BHANUDAS BAGUL VERSUS MEGHA WALMIK BAGUL
... Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Aghav Avinash D Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R D Khadap.
... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: April 23, 2014 ...
Heard.
Application is vehemently opposed by the learned Counsel for respondent – non applicant.
Perused the cause disclosed in the application. Delay condoned. Application is allowed and stands disposed of.
kadam/
(V.K. JADHAV, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
WALMIK BHANUDAS BAGUL
MEGHA WALMIK BAGUL
S.S. SHINDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
