The court condoned the 208-day delay in filing a restoration application, imposed costs, set aside an order refusing registration, and restored the writ petition to the file.
Condonation of delay with costs; order refusing registration set aside; writ petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1707 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION ST.NO.10043 OF 2013 (R.C.NO.1113 OF 2013)
Vasant Narsing Hadule
..Applicant
Versus
Maharashtra Gramin Bank Nanded and ors.
..Respondents
Mrs M.T.Biradar, Advocate h/f Mr U.R.Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : 11th July 2014
PER COURT
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
(vvr/1707.14ca)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 208 days in filing the restoration application and to restore the writ petition to the file.
Vasant Narsing Hadule
Maharashtra Gramin Bank Nanded and ors.
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
