Civil application filed by the applicant seeking quashment of an order dismissing a letter patent appeal due to want of prosecution. The court allowed the application, quashed the dismissal order, and restored the appeal.
Order of dismissal dismissed; appeal restored to original number; civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11867 OF 2013 IN LPA/106/2012
MAHARASHTRA AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CO-OP. LTD. VERSUS SAVITA MULKRAJ SHARMA
... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. B. Yenge Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. N. Upadhye
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Dated: August 01, 2014
... PER COURT :
( V.L. ACHLIYA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
… dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order dismissing a letter patent appeal on account of want of prosecution deserves to be quashed and the appeal restored upon subsequent application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Co-Op. Ltd.
Savita Mulraj Sharma
R. M. Borde
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
