The court rejected a bail application regarding an offence under rape laws and SC/ST Act. It noted the applicant's alleged role as an accomplice and the prosecution evidence, including the injury certificate, dismissing the plea for release.
Application for bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p5 BA 1740 OF 2014.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1740 OF 2014
Samadhan Mahadeo Pawar ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. Mahesh M. Chandanshiv, for the Applicant Mr.S. H. Yadav, APP for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE : 22nd September, 2014
P.C.:
1 / 2
p5 BA 1740 OF 2014.doc
attributed to him, he is to be released on bail. The present applicant is in jail since 4th September, 2013.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to an applicant accused of assisting in the commission of rape.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Samadhan Mahadeo Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
Mrudula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
