Shrimant Akaram Mali v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail where no change of circumstances was found since a recent rejection. The High Court rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
ba.1477.2014.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1477 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.Milind Deshmukh for Applicant Ms.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 1, 2014
perusal of the application, it is found that on 9.5.2014, this Court had rejected the bail application No.778 of 2014, which was filed by the applicant. There is no change of circumstance to move this second bail application.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
vss 1 of 1
SHERLA
MADAMji A.A. MANE
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court