Consent order in an arbitration petition referring disputes between the parties to a sole arbitrator, appointing the venue, timeline, and procedural conditions.
Dispute referred to sole arbitrator Mr. Shyam Mehta; order passed by consent with timeline and venue fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
903-ARP-54-2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 54 OF 2014
Laxman Gopichand Kariyaa … Petitioner Versus Eagle Agro Farm Private Limited … Respondents
Mr. A. Daver a/w. Mr. Sayeed Mulani i/b. M/s. Mulani & Company for the Petitioner.
Ms. Chandana S. for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and the following order is passed by consent :
Nitin
2
903-ARP-54-2014
Arbitrator, they shall not seek any adjournment and shall proceed with the matter on such dates. The undertaking is accepted.
viii. The venue of arbitration shall be at Mumbai.
The above Arbitration Petition is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
Laxman Gopichand Kariyaa
Eagle Agro Farm Private Limited
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
