High Court of Bombay disposed of an arbitration petition (and related contempt/leave petitions) without deciding the merits on the date of the order. The specific order details are not in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
945-ARBP-742-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 742 OF 2013
WITH
LEAVE PETITION NO. 125 OF 2013
&
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 593 OF 2013 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 40 OF 2014
| Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. | … | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Shiv-vani Oil and Gas Exploration Ser.Ltd. | … | Respondent |
Mr. S. Jagtiani i/b. M/s. N. Desai Associates for the Petitioner. Ms. Neha Prashant i/b. ALMT Legal for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
The above Contempt Petition shall be heard alongwith
Arbitration Appeal (L) No. 1151 of 2014 filed by the above Petitioner.
The Arbitration Petition No. 742 of 2013 is accordingly
disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
Baker Hughes Singapore Pte.
Shiv-vani Oil and Gas Exploration Ser.Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
