The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition challenging an appeal award of the Bombay Stock Exchange Arbitral Tribunal, relying on a companion petition.
Petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp733-13.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION No.733 OF 2013
Hiteshkumar Narsinghdas Daga ...Petitioner (Original Respondent) V/s.
Sharad Lohia ...Respondent (Original Applicant)
Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, i/b. Shikhir Grover, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Chetan Kapadia along with Mr. Rohan Kelkar and Mr. Deepan Dixit, i/b. M/s. Kartikeya & Associates, for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
RESERVED ON : MARCH 4, 2014 PRONOUNCED ON : JULY 30, 2014.
P.C. :
. This Petition challenges an award passed by the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal of the Bombay Stock Exchange ('BSE') in an appeal against the award of a sole arbitrator under the Rules, Bye-laws and Regulations of BSE.
sg Pg 1 of 2
arbp733-13.doc
sg
Petition No.514 of 2013 dismissing the Petition, there is no merit in the challenge to the impugned award even in the Petition herein.
( S.C.GUPTE, J. )
Pg 2 of 2
sg
Hiteshkumar Narsinghdas Daga
Sharad Lohia
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
