The Bombay High Court in Arbitration Application No. 85 of 2014 disposed of the application for want of prosecution by the applicant, who appeared unrepresented. The application was dismissed without substantive merits being considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
945-ARBAP-85-2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 85 2014
… Applicant
Versus
… Respondents
None for the Applicant
None for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 26th AUGUST, 2014
P.C.:
None for the Applicant. The above Arbitration Application is
therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Arbitration Application No. 85 of 2014 stands disposed of for want of prosecution.
Abdul K. Abdul M. Gazdar & Ors.
M/s. Nanavati Constructions & Ors.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
