This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-APPR-98.2013
sjs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2013
{For Stay}
IN
REVISION APPLICATION NO.109 OF 2014
Satish Arjun Waghmare.... Applicant
Vs.
Mrs. Jyoti Satish Waghmare
& Anr..... Respondents
Mr. Sunil More for the Applicant.
Ms Madhuri Raibagkar for Respondent No.1.
Ms Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for Respondent
No.2-State.
CORAM: P.D. KODE, J.
DATED: DECEMBER 11, 2014
P.C:
Heard. A perusal of the order dated
18-6-2012 reveals that the same is based on
uncontroverted facts averred in the petition
and in support of which an affidavit has been
filed. Hence, no case is made out for grant of
interim stay. Interim stay refused. The
application is disposed of.
Satish Arjun Waghmare
Mrs. Jyoti Satish Waghmare
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court