The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Criminal Application No. 665 of 2013. The court condoned the delay as the leave to appeal application under the previous number was already disposed of, and disposed of the present application without addressing merits.
Delay condoned; Criminal Application No. 665 of 2013 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Aurangabad
Criminal Application No. 665 of 2013 (In Criminal Application No. 664 of 2013)
(The State of Maharashtra, through the Inspector, Railway Protection Force, Parali, Dist. Beed Vs.
Satish Dangudu Lohar & another)
Appearances : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY 2014
P.C. :
Since the merits of the Application for leave to appeal have been considered, and the same has been disposed of thereafter, the delay is treated as condoned. The present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly.
( ABHAY M. THIPSAY ) JUDGE
bgp/cria665
State of Maharashtra through Inspector RPF Parali
Satish Dangudu Lohar
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
