Application by appellants seeking early hearing of a 1994 Criminal Revision Application was dismissed as counsel was absent and record untraceable.
Criminal Application No. 65 of 2008 dismissed due to absence of counsel and untraceable record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPLN 65.98.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 1998 IN CRIMINAL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 1994
Mr. Deepak Dhaku Rathod & Anr.
... Applicants.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
None for the Applicants. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
OCTOBER 08, 2014.
P.C. :-
This is an application filed by the Applicant seeking early hearing of Criminal Revision Application of 1994. The learned Counsel for the Applicant is absent when the Application is called out for hearing. It also appears that the record is not traceable. In that light of the matter, Criminal Application No.65 of 2008 is dismissed.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
Deepak Dhaku Rathod & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
P. V. Hardas
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
