Criminal appeal from acquittal under Section 138 NI Act. Court allowed application and granted special leave under Section 378(4) CrPC, noting arguable point on liability between brother and cheque issuer.
Application allowed; Special leave granted under s. 378(4) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appln. No. 610/13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 610 OF 2013
Shradha Saburi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mariyadit, Chouraha, Aurangabad.
....Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents.
Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant. Mr. B.L. Dhas, APP for State.
Mr. S.A. Ambad, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 3rd December, 2014.
ORDER :
Cri.Appln. No. 610/13
2
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Special Leave Petition under section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. should be allowed given the acquittal finding of no outstanding liability.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shradha Saburi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mariyadit
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
