The applicants filed criminal applications which the bench disposed of as withdrawn upon instructions from counsel, with interim reliefs vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.3115 of 2014
Sanjay S/o Ganpat Mane & Others. .. Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. -------- With Criminal Application No.2853 of 2014
Suresh S/o Limbaji Bansode. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents.
Shri. Rajendra G. Hange, Advocate, for applicants. Shri. D.R. Kale, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER 2014 ORDER:
Sd/-
(T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
rsl
Sanjay S/o Ganpat Mane & Others
Suresh S/o Limbaji Bansode
The State of Maharashtra & Anr
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
