Criminal applications were dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay because the appellant in person did not press for the relief prayed for in the applications.
Both criminal applications were dismissed as the applicant did not press for the relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
926-14-appln-c=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 926 OF 2014
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 927 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 587 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan, applicant in person Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for respondent State
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 7th OCTOBER, 2014.
P.C. :
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (P. V. HARDAS, J.)
1/1
Uday S. Jagtap
Uday S. Jagtap
State
P. V. HARDAS
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
