Single bench held that the criminal bail application cannot be entertained as the applicant was previously denied liberty to file a second one. The matter was listed for final hearing of the appeal.
Bail application dismissed; appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.567.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.567 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.575 OF 2012
Eknath Dattu Patil
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.K.J. Patil for the Applicant Ms.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: JULY 18, 2014
P.C.:
1 / 2
appa.567.2014.doc
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal bail application can be entertained when liberty to file a second one was previously denied.
Eknath Dattu Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhartkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
