Nutan Ajit Lokhande v. Sanjit Chandrasen Lokhande and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a criminal application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, viewing 348 days as inexcusable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
35.APPA.158-14.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.158 OF 2014
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.87 OF 2014 [Nutan A. Lokhande Vs. Sanjit Chandrasen Lokhande & Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. Manoj A. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP, for the State.
CORAM : M. L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2014
P.C. :
JUDGE
1 / 1
Nutan A. Lokhande
Sanjit Chandrasen Lokhande
M. L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court