These five appeals were dismissed as infructuous because the challenged order directing the release of security had already been implemented on 1 September 2014, rendering the appeals of no practical use.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
app-489-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.489 OF 2014 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.853 OF 2014
M/s. Central Warehousing Corporation ... Appellant Versus
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited... Respondents
ALONGWITH
APPEAL NO.490 OF 2014
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.793 OF 2014
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited... Respondents
ALONGWITH
APPEAL NO.491 OF 2014
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.854 OF 2014
M/s. Central Warehousing Corporation ... Appellant Versus
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited... Respondents
1 of 5
SRK
app-489-14.sxw
ALONGWITH APPEAL NO.493 OF 2014 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.792 OF 2014
M/s. Central Warehousing Corporation ... Appellant Versus
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited... Respondents
ALONGWITH APPEAL NO.495 OF 2014 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.855 OF 2014
M/s. Central Warehousing Corporation ... Appellant Versus
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited... Respondents
Mr. Sandesh Shukla with Mr. R.H. Mirchandani for appellant.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S. SONAK, J. DATED : 26 September , 2014
P.C.
These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 31 July 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in five separate arbitration petitions, directing the Prothonotary & Senior Master of this Court to release the security furnished by Aqdas Maritime Agency Private
SRK
2 of 5
app-489-14.sxw
Limited, respondent herein (petitioner before the learned Single Judge) pursuant to the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 25 July 2012 in Arbitration Petition under section 9 of the Act.
3 of 5
SRK
app-489-14.sxw
“Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. None appears for the Respondents despite due service and despite the fact that the matters were adjourned on the last occasion as and by way of last chance to the Respondents.
Admit.”
4 of 5
app-489-14.sxw
2014, a prayer was made seeking stay of operation of the order and the learned Single Judge had rejected the prayer for stay.
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SONAK, J.
5 of 5
SRK
M/s. Central Warehousing Corporation
Aqdas Maritime Agency Private Limited
Mohit S. Shah
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
