Disposed
M/S.Food Corporation of India v. M/S.Anticlizo Shipping Corporation
Bombay HCAPP/331/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
u.kambli
app331-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.331 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2733 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.35 OF 2001 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.12 OF 1993 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.1581 OF 2014 IN APPEAL NO.331 OF 2014
The Food Corporation of India ..Appellant vs. Antclizo Shipping Corporation ..Respondent
Mr.Kevic Setalvad. Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr. Ashutosh Karnik, Mr. S.D. Shetty, Mr. Rajendra Gujar, Ms Jasmine Upadhye i/b. M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for the Appellant.
Mr. T.N. Subramanian, Sr. Advocate alongwith Ms Snehal Shah, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh i/b V. Subramanian for Respondent.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SONAK, J. DATE : 12 AUGUST 2014
P.C.:
After the judgment is pronounced, learned counsel for the appellant prays for continuing the ad-interim stay which is operating till now.
1 of 2
2 app331-14
u.kambli
CHIEF JUSTICE
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ad-interim stay in the underlying arbitration proceedings should be extended.
The Food Corporation of India
Antclizo Shipping Corporation
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court