This is an appeal from an order imposing civil prison. The appellant later expired, rendering the appeal infructuous without respondent appearance. Both appeal and civil application were disposed of due to death.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous. Civil application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.94ao
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 11 OF 1994 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1688 OF 2010
Suresh s/o Kumudrao Raje, Age: 50 years, Occ: Business & Agri., R/o. Osmanabad, Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad.
...Appellant
versus
Prataprao s/o Bhupalrao Raje, Age: 67 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Osmanabad, residing at Wadgaon (Nimbala) Tq. Baramati, Dist. Pune and others.
...Respondents
Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant.
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE ,J.
DATED : 17TH JULY, 2014
PER COURT :
. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the appellant
submits that the order impugned in the appeal is passed under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure ordering the appellant to undergo in civil prison.
11.94ao
-2-
appellant informed that the appellant has expired on 13/03/2012.
stated herein above is not disputed.
as infructuous.
Tupe/ 17.07.14
Suresh s/o Kumudrao Raje
Prataprao s/o Bhupalrao Raje and others
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
