Allowed leave to file appeal based on evidence of the minor prosecutrix and medical testimony. Admitted appeal and ordered initiation of action under Section 390 Cr.P.C.
Leave to file appeal allowed; Appeal admitted; Action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ladda
1 901-als-81-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 81 of 2014
(LEAVE TO APPEAL)
The State of Maharashtra
.. Applicant.
Versus
Vilas Lotan Patil
.. ..Respondent.
Smt. V.R. Bhonsale, APP for the State-Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- 22nd AUGUST, 2014.
P.C. :-
(A.R. JOSHI, J) ( SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J)
1 /1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file appeal should be granted against the impugned order.
Whether Section 390 of Cr.P.C. should be invoked.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Vilas Lotan Patil
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
