Order allowing withdrawal of anticipatory bail application and dismissing it. Similarly, an intervening criminal application is disposed of. No substantive legal principles or merits are discussed.
Anticipatory bail application allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed; intervening application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
aba.683.2014+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.683 OF 2014
Suhasini Nandkumar Borade ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
a/w
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2014 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.683 OF 2014
Arun Shankar Ghodse … Applicant/Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Suhasini Nandkumar Borade ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Sachin Deokar i/b V.V. Purwant for the Applicant Ms.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent – State Mr.M.V. Thorat for Intervener
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: JULY 22, 2014
P.C.:
to be rejected on merits. However, in view of the above, application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Criminal application for intervention also stands dispose of.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
Suhasini Nandkumar Borade
The State of Maharashtra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
