High Court confirmed interim anticipatory bail for an accused facing charges under sections 307, 332 and 506 IPC. The Court modified bail conditions by relaxing the requirement of police station attendance.
Interim protection confirmed as bail; condition of police station attendance relaxed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
aba.563.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.563 OF 2014
Sharad Narayan Thakur
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.S.V. Marwadi for the Applicant Ms.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: JULY 16, 2014
P.C.:
The crime is registered at C.R. No.12 of 2014. However, she could escape and save herself. The applicant/accused and the complainant are married for 20 years and have two children.
1 / 2
aba.563.2014.doc
is filed and he is informed that the police are sending chargesheet today to the concerned Court.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted earlier should be confirmed and modified by relaxing the attendance condition.
Whether the applicant is eligible for anticipatory bail on the charges of sections 307, 332 and 506 IPC.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
SHARAD NARAYAN THAKUR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
