Disposed

Rajesh Ramesh Parkar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Dec 2014ABA/1598/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court considered anticipatory bail applications requesting time to surrender. Disposing the applications as withdrawn, the court directed surrender by 23-12-2014 and instructed the investigating officer not to arrest the applicants until that deadline.

What did the court decide?

Applications disposed of as withdrawn. Direction to Investigating Officer not to arrest applicants until 23.12.2014. Order to surrender on or before 23.12.2014.

Rajesh Ramesh Parkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

908-aba-1598-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1598 OF 2014

¶4

Rajesh Ramesh Parkar
and Another ...Applicants
vs.
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶5

WITH

¶6

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1599 OF 2014

¶7

Ramesh Manohar Parkar
and Another ...Applicants
vs.
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶8

Mr. Kuldeep Patil, Advocate for the Applicants
Mrs. Y.M. Nakhwa a/w. Rajesh More, APP for the
State.

¶9

CORAM : P.D. KODE, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2014

¶10

P.C.

¶11

.Heard.

¶12

2. The learned counsel for applicants has

¶13

submitted that instead of pressing an application

Vishal

1/4

908-aba-1598-2014

for pre arrest bail, the applicants are making
limited request for granting reasonable time to the
applicants to surrender before the trial/remand
Court and pray for bail and in the meanwhile
protecting them on the conditions deemed fit and
proper by this Court and giving appropriate
direction to the trial Court to decide their
application for bail at the earliest preferably on
the same day.

¶18

3. Request being made for surrendering before

¶19

the Court of Law which would facilitate earlier
completion of investigation of crime in question,
request deserves consideration.

¶20

4.The applications stands disposed of as

¶21

withdrawn.

¶22

5.As informed the applicants to surrender

¶23

before the appropriate Court on or before 2312
2014 by 11.00 a.m. The investigating officer of

2/4

Vishal

908-aba-1598-2014

C.R. No. 74 of 2014 of Malvan police station,

¶28

Sindhudurg registered for the offences punishable
under sections 307, 353, 143, 147, 148, 504 and 506
of Indian Penal Code not to take coercive steps of
arrest against the applicants uptil 23122014,

¶29

11.00 a.m. In the meanwhile, the applicants to stay
at the addresses mentioned in the applications and
to attend the investigating officer everyday in
between 11.00 am to 1.00 pm. and not to indulge in
any activity of tampering the prosecution evidence
and/or not to indulge in any activity of coercing,

¶30

threatening and pressuring the prosecution
witnesses and not to misuse the protection granted
by this order for fleeing away or for any other
oblique purpose.

¶31

6.The trial Court to decide the application

¶32

for bail if preferred by the applicants after their
surrender at the earliest preferably on the same
day subject to 24 hours advance copy of the same

3/4

Vishal

908-aba-1598-2014

being served upon the other side stipulating their

¶37

date and time of surrender.

¶38

Applications stands disposed of.

¶39

(P.D. KODE, J.)

¶40

4/4

¶41

Vishal

Rajesh Ramesh Parkar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Ramesh Parkar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradip Shivaji Kale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sachin Dashrath Bhosale (Intervener) Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kundlik Ganpati Kumbhar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sarappa Mhalappa Dhage Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dhanaji Mohan Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vaibhav Popat Narde and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra