Disposed

Anand Krushnat Takale and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Nov 2014ABA/1461/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a request for temporary protection, directing the investigating officer to not arrest the applicants until a specified date and ordering them to surrender to the trial court by 27 November 2014 while attending the investigating officer daily.

What did the court decide?

No coercive steps of arrest; protected until 27.11.2014 11:00 a.m.; surrender to trial court by 27.11.2014 11:00 a.m.; attend investigating officer daily.

Anand Krushnat Takale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

902-aba-1461-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1461 OF 2014

¶4

Anand Krushnat Takale
and Another ...Applicants
vs.
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶5

Mr. P.J. Thorat, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the State.

¶6

CORAM : P.D. KODE, J.

¶7

DATE : NOVEMBER 20, 2014

¶8

P.C.

¶9

.Heard.

¶10

2.Learned counsel for the applicants states

¶11

that instead of pressing an application for pre

¶12

arrest bail, he is making limited request for

¶13

granting reasonable time to the applicants to
surrender before the trial Court and pray for bail

¶14

and in the meanwhile protecting them on the
conditions deemed fit and proper by this Court and

1/3

Vishal

902-aba-1461-2014

giving appropriate direction to the learned
Magistrate to decide the application for bail at
the earliest. It is submitted that the applicant
No. 1 is a retired person and has desire to make
some arrangement for refunding the amount which had
allegedly taken by his son.

¶19

3. Considering the reason for which the

¶20

protection is sought and the request being made for
surrendering before the Court of Law which would
facilitate earlier completion of investigation of
crime in question, request deserves consideration.

¶21

4. As informed the applicants to surrender

¶22

before the trial Court on or before 27th November,

¶23

2014 by 11.00 a.m. In the meanwhile, the
applicants to stay at the addresses mentioned in
the application and to attend the investigating
officer everyday in between 11.00 am to 1.00 pm.

¶24

and not to indulge in any activity of tampering the
prosecution evidence and/or not to indulge in any

¶25

Vishal

¶26

902-aba-1461-2014

¶27

activity of coercing, threatening and pressuring
the prosecution witnesses and not to misuse the
protection granted by this order for fleeing away
or for any other oblique purpose.

¶28

5. In the said premises, the investigating

¶29

officer of C.R. No. 285 of 2012 registered with

¶30

Vijapur Naka police station, Solapur for the
offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 504

¶31

and 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code not to

¶32

take coercive steps of arrest against the
applicants uptil 27th November, 2014, 11.00 a.m.

¶33

6.The trial Court to decide the application

¶34

for bail if preferred by the applicants after their
surrender at the earliest subject to 24 hours
advance copy of the same being served upon the
other side.

¶35

Application stands disposed of.

¶36

3/3

¶37

Vishal

Anand Krushnat Takale and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Krushnat Takale and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanmant Digambar Shinde (Patil) Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shahaji Sopan Shirgire and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bhimrao Ganpati Chauhan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Inayatali Abdulsalam Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Raju Tijomal Wadhwa Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Raju Tijomal Wadhwa Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.