Naushad Ibrahim Bobade v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In an anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay confirmed an ad-interim order after the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor reported that the parties settled the matter and the first informant received the keys of the flat.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim order granted on 29.09.2014 confirmed with modification requiring the applicant to attend the I.O. if summoned.
What the court decided
6_aba_1258_14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1258 OF 2014
Mr. Naushad Ibrahim Bobade ... Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Ritesh Ratnam, for the Applicant Mrs. R.A. Ambekar, APP for the RespondentState
CORAM: P.D. KODE, J.
DATED: NOVEMBER 26, 2014
P.C:
- Learned APP states that as per the instructions received from the I.O. the parties have settled the matter and the first informant has received the keys of the Flat and as such the steps are being taken
for enforcing further part of the settlement, the State has no objection for confirming adinterim order granted in favour of the Applicant. Learned APP tenders report to such effect given by the I.O.
- Report is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
- In the said premises adinterim order granted on
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Naushad Ibrahim Bobade
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
P.D. KODE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court