The High Court of Bombay disposed of a suit by notice of motion on consent terms signed by the parties. The undertakings were accepted, and the notice of motion was struck out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901 sl830-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT (L) NO.830 OF 2014 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.1982 OF 2014 IN SUIT (L) NO.830 OF 2014
Kokila Jitendra Doshi and Anr.
...Plaintiffs
vs
Jignesh Jitendra Doshi and Anr.
...Defendants
Mr.Harihar Bhave i/b M/s.Bhave and Co. for the Plaintiff
Mr.Pradeep Samant & Associates for defendant no.1 and 2
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 3, 2014
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel for the parties tender consent terms duly signed by the parties who are present in court and their respective advocates. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The statement and undertaking tendered therein are accepted. Suit is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Refund of court fee, if any, as per rules.
2 In view thereof, Notice of Motion does not survive. The same is also disposed of.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
1/1
Mohite
Kokila Jitendra Doshi and Anr.
Jignesh Jitendra Doshi and Anr.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
