On plaintiffs' instructions, the court granted leave to withdraw the suit and dismissed it as withdrawn, ordering return of court fee per Rules.
Leave to withdraw the suit granted; suit dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
72-S733-95.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 733 OF 1995
Videocon International Limited
Versus
Lal Makhija
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
Mr. Avik Sarkar, i/by Kamal & Co., for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:7th April 2014
PC:-
1.On instructions from the plaintiffs, learned advocate seeks
leave to withdraw the suit.
2. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fee as per Rules.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the suit should be granted.
Videocon International Limited
Lal Makhija
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court