Mahakosh Holdings Pvt.Ltd v. Pebble Securities Ltd.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In HCJ Suit No. 2931 of 1997 between Mahakosh Holdings Private Limited and others, the court dismissed the suit under Order IX Rule 8 CPC due to the absence of the plaintiff's advocate despite the plaintiff's name being called. Previously granted interim relief was vacated.
What did the court decide?
The suit was dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 CPC and all interim or ad-interim relief granted earlier was vacated.