The suit was listed for directions. Notice was issued on the printed board and High Court Website regarding dismissal for non-appearance of plaintiffs. As no party appeared, the court dismissed the suit under Order IX Rule 3 CPC.
The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC; any interim relief granted earlier stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-S2375-94.DOC
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2375 OF 1994
M/s. Manish Diamonds..Plaintiffs.
Versus
M/s. Paradiam N.V...Defendants.
..Defendants.
None for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J. Monday, 24th February 2014.
P.C. :
1.The suit is listed for directions today. A notice has been issued on the
printed board, as also on the High Court Website, to the effect that from 10th
February 2014, when suit/s listed under the caption for directions are called
out, if none appears for the plaintiff/s, the suit will be dismissed.
2.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly shown.
None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is dismissed under Order
IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if
any, granted earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand
vacated forthwith.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC for non-appearance of the plaintiffs when the notice was issued via the printed board and the High Court Website.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Manish Diamonds
M/s. Paradiam N.V.
GS Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court