Suit was dismissed for non-appearance by plaintiffs when called for directions before the Bombay High Court under Order IX Rule 3 CPC. Any interim relief granted earlier was vacated.
Suit dismissed; interim relief, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-S1650-1997.DOC
Vishal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.1650 OF 1997
Madhu Milan Syntex Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Industrial Investment Bank of India
...Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs None for the Defendants
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 19th MARCH, 2014
PC:-
1. The suit is listed for directions today. A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the High Court Website, to the effect that when a suit listed under the caption for directions is called out, if none appears for the plaintiff/s, the suit will be dismissed.
2. The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
