The suit was dismissed for want of appearance by the plaintiffs when the matter was called in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Order IX Rule 3 CPC.
Suit dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC. Interim reliefs vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-S1303-88.DOC
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1303 OF 1988
…Plaintiffs
M/s. Arcadia Premises Coop. Soc. Ltd.…Plaintiffs
Versus
M/s. Gupta Investment & Construction Pvt. Ltd.…Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 8th July 2014
PC:-
1.A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the
High Court Website, to the effect that, when a suit listed,
irrespective of the caption under which it appears, if none appears
for the Plaintiff/s when the matter is called out, the suit will be
dismissed.
2.The names of the Plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit is maintainable in the absence of the plaintiffs.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Arcadia Premises Coop. Soc. Ltd.
M/s. Gupta Investment & Construction Pvt. Ltd.
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court