High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of a transfer application. The Court held the application was vague and the Presiding Officer was not related to the defendants.
The transfer application was rejected and the Writ Petition was dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 929.2013
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 929 OF 2013
Vilas Bhila Biraris V/s Parwatabai Ramchandra Patil & Ors.
| Office Notes,Office | Court's or Judge's orders |
|---|---|
| Memoranda of |
|
| Coram,appearances, | ................................ |
| Court's orders or |
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. |
| directions and |
|
| Registrar's orders | DATE : 04/02/2013. |
Mr. A.S.Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioner.
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 929.2013
apprehension about the result of the said Civil Suit. As such, the matter ought to have been transferred.
KNP/W.P. 929.2013
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the District Judge's order rejecting the petitioner's transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC.
Whether the vague averments regarding a close relationship between the defendants and the Presiding Officer justify a transfer.
Vilas Bhila Biraris
Parwatabai Ramchandra Patil
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
