This court disposed of a criminal writ petition where counsel was absent and the APP filed a 'B' summary report, which was taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
91-11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 91 OF 2011
VASANT DATTATRAYA BHATLAWANDE AND ANR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. K. G. Patil.
***
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA,JJ.
DATED: 12th SEPTEMBER,2013
PER COURT:
1. Counsel called - absent.
2. Learned A.P.P. says that "B" summary
report is filed. The Report is taken on
record.
3. Consequently, the Criminal Writ
Petition No.91 of 2011 is disposed of.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA, J.] [K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.]
Dt.12/09/2013
ans/91-11
Vasant Dattatraya Bhatlwande and Anr
The State of Maharashtra and Anr
K.U.CHANDIWAL
A.I.S.CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court