High Court granted the petitioner three weeks to remain present before the District Deputy Collector in proceedings under the Slum Act, staying implementation of adverse orders for two weeks.
Granted three weeks to appear; no implementation of adverse orders for two weeks from service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL.1057.2013.903.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1057 OF 2013
GRACY LOUIS HENDRIQUES :- PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA :- RESPONDENT
Mr. Mukesh M. Vashi, i/b. M/s. M. P. Vashi and Associates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. S. Saluja, AGP, for the Respondent.
CORAM :- RANJIT MORE,J. DATED :- APRIL 29, 2013
P.C. :-
Heard Counsel for the parties.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
WPL.1057.2013.903.doc
(RANJIT MORE,J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking time to remain present before the District Deputy Collector can be disposed of by granting a 3-week extension.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
GRACY LOUIS HENDRIQUES
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court