Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition challenging impugned order and bank actions; court disposed of petition as withdrawn granting liberty to pursue other remedies.
Petitioner at liberty to take appropriate steps against impugned order and action taken by bank as permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 900.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 900 OF 2013
Sunil Shikarchand Patodi .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri K. J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2013.
PER COURT :
. Shri Suryawanshi, the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy against the order impugned in the present writ petition and the action taken by the bank and the Special Recovery Officer.
2 wp 900.13
impugned and the action taken by the bank as is permissible in
law.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/March 13
Sunil Shikarchand Patodi
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
