The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of two settled writ petitions by recording consent terms filed on 28th June, 2013, without any specific order as to costs.
Both writ petitions were disposed of in accordance with the consent terms filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901 wp8484-11withwp4352-10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Mohite
WRIT PETITION NO.8484 OF 2011 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4352 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.Neel Helekar for the petitioner in both the petitions
Mr.Atman Mehta i/b M/s.Haresh Mehta & Co. for the respondent in both the petitions
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 01/07/2013
PC :
1/2
901 wp8484-11withwp4352-10.doc
petitioner admits that matters are settled out of court. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
2/2
Mohite
Respondent
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
