The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Third Respondent to approve the appointment of the First Petitioner within one month and to release the stopped salary.
Directing the Third Respondent to take a decision on the appointment proposal within one month and release the stopped salary immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP8220.12
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8220 OF 2012
Smt.Rupali Ramchandra Namde ....Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh along with Mr.Deshmukh Rajaram B. for the petitioners.
Ms.Sushma Bhende AGP for State/respondent nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.
DATE : 22nd February , 2013.
P.C. :-
Shri Dattatraya Ganpat Tonape & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors in Writ Petition No.3055 of 2012 which was disposed of by an order dated 9th July 2012.
3 We therefore, dispose of the writ petition by directing the Third Respondent to take a decision on the proposal submitted by the Second Petitioner for approval to the appointment of the First Petitioner. The decision shall be taken in any event within a period of
2 WP8220.12
one month from the date on which an authenticated copy of this order is produced on the record of the Third Respondent by the Petitioners. In the mean time, the salary payable to the petitioner which has been stopped shall be released.
4 The petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Third Respondent should be directed to decide on the proposal for appointment of the First Petitioner.
Whether the salary stopped from the petitioner should be released in the meantime.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri Dattatraya Ganpat Tonape & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Writ Petition No.3055 of 2012Referred¶14
Smt.Rupali Ramchandra Namde
State of Maharashtra
S.J.Vazifdar
Mrs.Mridula Bhaktar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
