The petitioner stated that suspension was withdrawn, rendering the writ petition moot; the High Court disposed of the case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.739/2013
Shri Arvind Ganpatrao Surtekar ...Versus...
Adarsha Shikshan Mandal, Razura, through its Secretary Kishanrao Watekar and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.N. Shende, Adv. for petitioner Shri M.P. Kariya, Adv. for R – 1 Shri A.D. Sonak, AGP for R - 3
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
Z.A. HAQ, JJ.
DATE : 02.07.2013
The learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that suspension is withdrawn, therefore, nothing survives in this petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
ssw
Shri Arvind Ganpatrao Surtekar
Adarsha Shikshan Mandal, Razura
Kishanrao Watekar
Anoop V. Mohta
Z.A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
